Jumpstart Your AP Automation Project

So you want to move to invoice automation – imaging, workflow, or even electronic invoicing. Problem is, your CFO, Controller, AP Manager, or IT staff hasn’t bought in. You’ve got a plan, but don’t have the buy-in to start. So what is the surefire way get your project approved?

PayStream has developed simple metric – PIQ (paper invoice quotient) – to analyze operations and simplify the way management thinks about AP. PIQ is a simple way to better communicate the opportunity to management. It is a score derived from a standardized survey to measure your organization’s level of dependency on paper in AP.

PIQ includes two different concepts: efficiency and effectiveness. For example, an efficiency metric would be determining that your cost is $6 per invoice to process. The effectiveness metric is how long it takes to process that invoice. Typically, AP will say that it takes 24 or 48 hours to process, or during rush times maybe a week. However, that’s only part of the story. You need to know how long the invoice takes from the viewpoint of the supplier or CFO.

PIQ tracking starts at the invoice date and ends on the day the corresponding voucher is approved in your accounting system.  The PIQ is then calculated by taking the approval time divided into the percentage of electronic invoices. By weaving in these two concepts, PIQ makes it simple for you to demonstrate opportunity to your senior managers.

Metrics and Your PIQ

PayStream conducted an AP Benchmarking Survey in the Fall of 2009 and asked survey respondents questions that would serve as guideposts to help other AP departments benchmark their business. The number one response (65 percent) to the biggest opportunity inside of AP was process inefficiency. Everyone wants to provide AP services cheaper, better, and faster.

The second ranked opportunity (53 percent) was improved visibility, which is driven around discount management. In other words, there’s a frustration, especially among senior managers, about invoices floating around the organization and not being in the company’s ERP system.

We call this “invoice float” because the invoice is moving around the organization and may be sitting on someone’s desk, perhaps because the person is on vacation, investigating a discrepancy, or wants to post the invoice in Q4 rather than Q3.

Envisioning Your ROI

The first source of ROI is AP efficiency. Reducing processing costs and speeding up the process will account for anywhere from 25 to 35 percent of the opportunity. The remaining percentage comes from spend visibility; how money is being spent and the timing of that spend. The next piece is working capital authorization. Having better visibility to the spend can allow you to take advantage of paying some suppliers early in exchange for a discount.

Having a broad foundation to your business case means bringing in other business units and working with your counterparts—including Treasury, Procurement, and Finance. It’s vitally important to consider all of these elements together. One of our clients received approval for an AP project in the past, only to have the assistant controller reallocate the funds to another project. When we did an analysis, we found that the AP manager had only included about 24 percent of his business case. He missed a huge chunk of opportunity.

The one tip that we always like to suggest is that you should visualize your ROI model. The first thing you will notice is that there is some red, which means that it’s going to cost money before you start saving money. The first thing that the people reviewing your business case want to know is how much the project is going to cost. It’s important to show that you have a realistic plan and understand that it will go negative before positive.

The Four Truths

When it comes to AP automation, there are four truths you need to face and overcome to achieve success:

1. Phantom Pain. The people who make the decisions about AP automation don’t really understand the pain of suboptimal processes, because they aren’t involved in AP. That’s why you need to make it simple for the CFO, controller, or IT manager to understand your pain and business case.

2. The End of Meaningless Metrics. To convince the right people, you have to communicate in their language, not the language of AP. Present your facts, compare yourselves with others, and show the the dollar value of your proposal. Make them feel the pain of a competitor or other recognizable innovator that is meaningful to them. Everyone wants to be least as good as or better than the Joneses, including your managers.

3. Making the Case. When building a broad foundation, remember that it’s not just about AP efficiency. It’s also about servicing your suppliers and making it easier for them to do business with you.

4. Destination Blues. You need to paint a picture of your vision; where you’re trying to go with automation. The vision is not that you’re going to use OCR or set up an electronic invoice portal, but rather that you want to move to a touchless process in AP. Management can equate a touchless process with reduced costs and increased visibility into the number of invoices and accruals. The destination blues involves convincing the people who need to approve your efforts. They won’t necessarily understand the technology, so you need to simplify it for them.

About Henry Ijams

Henry Ijams (pronounced Iams) is the Managing Director and Founder of PayStream Advisors, a financial automation consulting firm with a focus on emerging technologies in the financial supply chain. As a former banker and payments technology entrepreneur, he is well known in the financial automation and payments industry and speaks frequently at conferences. Mr. Ijams’ 20 years of experience includes key positions with Citibank and Manufacturers Hanover Trust as well as a manager of Ernst & Young’s Financial Services Consulting practice. Mr. Ijams has developed a leadership position in the financial industry through his research publications and articles on trends and strategies on the automation of back-office financial operations such as accounts receivable and payables, and treasury. He is widely quoted by such publications as Treasury & Risk Management, the AFP Journal, Document Management, Financial Times, CFO, and the American Banker. Mr. Ijams holds a BS in Management from Rochester Institute of Technology and an MBA from the UNC Kenan-Flagler School at Chapel Hill. He currently resides in Charlotte, NC.
This entry was posted in Voices and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>